• Report shows South Sudan only has four ventilators for the entire country; Northeast Syria has 11; Sierra Leone has 13; in Venezuela, 90% of hospitals lack critical supplies
  • The IRC is working to mitigate the spread of coronavirus among the world’s most vulnerable populations and calls for more funding for NGOs working to combat the disease

New report by the International Rescue Committee (IRC) finds that fragile and conflict-affected countries face a double emergency: the arrival and impact of COVID-19, and the secondary humanitarian, economic and political havoc this outbreak will wreak on countries like South Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Yemen and refugee camps worldwide.

As COVID-19 continues to spread around the world and to conflict zones like South Sudan and Yemen and refugee camps like in Greece, the International Rescue Committee (IRC) has published a new report, “COVID-19 in humanitarian crises: a double emergency,” exposing the devastating impact of COVID-19 on fragile countries. The report raises the alarm not only on the lack of capacity of these health systems to handle the outbreak itself, but the significant and destabilizing impacts -- including escalation of conflict, political and economic instability -- the pandemic will provoke.

The four countries detailed in this report-- South Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen-- as well as large refugee camps-- show particular vulnerabilities to this pandemic. While COVID-19 has already overwhelmed even the most advanced and prepared health systems in countries like the United States and United Kingdom, which measure ventilators, intensive care units and protective equipment in the thousands, these conflict-affected and fragile countries and many like them have close to none. Making up only 0.6% of world GDP, nearly half (46%) of the people in these four countries lack access to basic health services, while also facing acute shortages of supplies vital to fighting COVID-19. These fragile states are simply unable to deploy the strategies of wealthier countries against the virus, and will be severely affected by disruptions to humanitarian aid, risking an escalation of violence and economic and political instability:

David Miliband, President and CEO of the International Rescue Committee, said:
The IRC’s analysis paints a dire picture: the scale, severity and speed of the outbreak will be magnified in fragile countries. The double crisis needs a double response. 

First, immediate activity to prevent the spread of the disease is imperative. Without handwashing facilities the disease takes root, and without effective triaging of people it runs rife. One need only glance at the shocking disparity in ventilator and ICU numbers in crisis-affected states to understand the very real threat this poses to life and limb. Now is the opportunity to take advantage of the short window of time in places like Yemen and Syria to forestall the disease running rampant.

“Second, the lesson of the crisis is that the weakest links in the global health chain are a threat to health everywhere. We cannot afford these weak links, and must strengthen the efforts in war torn countries and communities to lift their life chances. 

“The international community, with the EU as a global leader, must equally ensure that underlying humanitarian vulnerabilities across these countries are not left to fester or to multiply. The call to abide by a global ceasefire launched by the UN Secretary General has never been more obvious. The global economic response, defined for instance by the G20, must cater to the needs of fragile and conflict-affected states. Should we fail, not only will the most vulnerable pay the price today for the inaction of the international community, the consequences will be felt across the globe for years, if not decades, to come.”

Imogen Sudbery, Director of Policy and Advocacy - Europe, added:
“We commend yesterday’s announcement of a new EU package of 20bn euros to help developing countries respond to COVID-19. Though it is a reallocation of existing funds rather than an injection of new additional funds, at this critical moment in the crisis it remains a  much-needed expression of solidarity. It is also a crucial step towards protecting greater numbers of lives and mounting a more effective public health response to assist the most vulnerable.  

“The EU’s triple focus on the humanitarian, health, and the social and economic consequences of the crisis is also welcomed. We encourage the EU to quickly replenish existing instruments and also consider establishing a ‘Fragile State Fund’ to ensure a more structured  response for frontline responders to meet the new COVID-related needs of fragile and conflict affected states, in both the immediate and longer term. 

“As the EU reconsiders the Multiannual Financial Framework budget lines as part of continuing efforts to address this pandemic, a rethink of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument will also be needed. This would include ensuring a stronger focus on transitioning from an emergency to a development phase in all health interventions both during and beyond the COVID response.

The IRC has launched a US $30 million appeal to help us mitigate the spread of coronavirus among the world’s most vulnerable populations. We are working across three key areas: to mitigate and respond to the spread of coronavirus within vulnerable communities; protect IRC staff; and ensure the continuation of our life-saving programming as much as possible across more than 40 countries worldwide.

Download the full report here.

Download images from the report here.